By RON JENKINS
Associated Press Writer
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) -- Oklahoma lawmakers have a choice this year: English as the "official" language of the state versus English as the "common" language.
Two measures addressing a touchy subject for many Oklahomans -- communications with their government -- are going through the legislative process.
Their sponsors are conservative Republicans, but their views are miles apart on the issue.
Rep. Randy Terrill, R-Moore, is back with his proposal for a vote of the people on establishing English as the official language of state government.
Sen. Patrick Anderson, R-Enid, thinks Terrill's plan is unconstitutional and has offered his "common language" alternative.
"I'm not a big proponent of my bill, but I think it is better than what Rep. Terrill has proposed," Anderson says.
Terrill refers to Anderson's plan as "meaningless."
The two legislators debated the issue last week before the Oklahoma Conservative Political Action Committee.
It was friendly territory for Terrill, who drew financial support from members of the conservative group in his re-election bid and was championed for his sponsorship of House Bill 1804, the state's tough anti-illegal immigration bill.
Charlie Meadows, chairman of the OCPAC, said he wanted to bring the two together to see if they could find some common ground and to explain their differences.
Meadows also disclosed that years before he had been a member of the U.S. English organization, which tried in vain to get an official English bill through Congress.
A third party in the debate are leaders of American Indian tribes. Chiefs of the five Civilized Tribes recently went on record for a second time against Terrill's legislation.
Cherokee Nation Principal Chief Chad Smith called it "intolerant, close-minded and mean-spirited."
"To me, it's not what Oklahomans are about as a people," Smith said. "We are warmhearted and accepting."
Smith said he thinks Terrill's legislation is specifically aimed at Hispanics, but "the biggest class of citizens who do not speak English as their first language are Indians, Native Americans."
"Terrill's bill divides people; Anderson's bill acknowledges our commonality," he said.
Terrill said he was "perplexed and confused the tribes would be opposed to this particular proposal because it exempts tribal languages."
The lawmaker said 30 other states have established a form of "official" English, but his plan would be the "strongest" proposal among the states.
Anderson said Terrill's plan is different from other official English measures because it contains a provision that "tries to define what is and what is not federal law. I'm not sure of any state that has done that."
He said it is unlike other state laws that contain express exclusions for federal law.
Anderson said lawmakers must be careful not to create confusion for state agencies that administer federal funds.
He also referred to an Oklahoma Supreme Court ruling in 2002 invalidating a state question that would have prohibited the use of non-English languages in state government. The state court said the proposal violated free speech rights.
"Free speech protects all speech, not just those who speak in English," Anderson said.
Terrill characterized Anderson's arguments as "legal mumbo-jumbo that keeps us from doing what we ought to do."
He said he was convinced his plan is constitutional.
Senate President Pro Tem Glenn Coffee, R-Oklahoma City, said last week he did not yet have a position on the issue and he did not know if the GOP caucus would have one.
Terrill said he would push hard for his plan, with the help of national groups that support the official English argument.
He said he was not impressed with Anderson's legal arguments, saying the Enid senator "perhaps got his law degree from Sears & Roebuck or Montgomery Ward."
Earlier, Anderson said he brought his bill in an effort to find a workable solution to the issue. He said he decided on the phrase, "common language," after talking to tribal leaders.
"Neither my bill nor his will create one job in Oklahoma or help us solve our budget crisis. The reason I'm bringing my bill forward is to get this issue off the table so we can get focused on what's truly important in Oklahoma."